Letter: It Is Reasonable for the Rich to Pay More in Stamp Duty
Translated from Swedish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Hans Sundmark argues that Swedenโs stamp duty should remain progressive because it is a tax, not an administrative fee.
- He contrasts a 150,000-kronor charge on a 10-million-kronor villa with a 30,000-kronor charge on a 2-million-kronor home.
- He warns that a flat fee could become disproportionately expensive for buyers of cheaper properties.
Stamp duty should not be mistaken for an administrative charge, argues Hans Sundmark in a response to a reader letter in Dagens Nyheter. It is a tax, he says, and higher charges on expensive homes are therefore reasonable.
The current rate is 1.5 percent of the purchase price. That means someone buying a villa for 10 million kronor pays 150,000 kronor, while a buyer paying 2 million kronor pays 30,000 kronor.
The difference may appear unfair if the authorityโs administrative work is the same in both cases. But Sundmark says the name itself is telling: this is โstamp tax,โ not a fee. A 10-million-kronor villa is also more likely to be bought by a high-income earner, or even a billionaire, he writes.
Changing the tax into a flat fee could create the opposite problem. The charge might become unreasonably high for someone buying a cheaper home. Sundmark adds that Bo Cedergren should perhaps be glad if the tax does not become even more progressive after the September 13 election, given the leftโs support for higher taxes on the wealthy.
Originally published by Dagens Nyheter in Swedish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.
Image: Nicklas Thegerstrรถm