Life sentence – a recipe for disaster

The case of Kristijan Aleksić has once again highlighted a recurring pattern in legal and political responses to public outrage: the swift announcement of legislative changes to appease public demand. The article argues that this approach prioritizes immediate public appeasement over a thorough understanding and resolution of the underlying issues that lead to tragic consequences.

This reactive legislative impulse is described as a political reflex. When an event deeply disturbs citizens and ignites public calls for justice, often framed as a demand for "blood," the response is to enact laws quickly. This often involves finding a scapegoat at a lower level, while those in higher positions avoid responsibility, rendering resignations a mere theoretical concept.

Simultaneously, a working group is typically established. Within a mere 14 days, this group is expected to produce legislation that, through an expedited procedure, will magically solve all problems. This process aims to calm the public until the next tragic incident occurs, capitalizing on what the article describes as the public's short memory, akin to that of a "human fish."

The piece implies that this cycle of rapid legislative change, driven by public pressure and political expediency, fails to address the fundamental causes of societal problems. It suggests a superficial approach that offers temporary relief but does not lead to lasting solutions or accountability for systemic failures.