DistantNews
Support us

Lindenhof is not an isolated case: Zurich police often tolerate left-wing extremist occupations, and politics wants it that way

From Neue Zürcher Zeitung · () German

Translated from German and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Outcome reported
  • About 100 mostly masked left-wing extremists occupied Zurich’s Lindenhof from Friday evening until Sunday morning, blocking entrances and causing noise complaints and graffiti.
  • City police said they tolerated the occupation after assessing the situation and consulting Security Director Karin Rykart, citing the risk of clashes and injuries.
  • The Swiss People’s Party criticized the approach, while Rykart said the decision did not depend on the activists’ political views.

The occupation of Zurich’s Lindenhof has become a pointed example of how militant groups can take over public space with little fear of being removed, according to the Neue Zürcher Zeitung.

About 100 people, most of them masked left-wing extremists, occupied the historic site above the Limmat from Friday evening until Sunday morning. Organizers described the action on Instagram as political. Its themes ranged from the climate crisis and rearmament to Gaza and Ceuta.

A dead cop is a good cop.

· Unidentified occupiersThe slogan appeared in graffiti on a historic building during the Lindenhof occupation.

The group barricaded the entrances, held concerts in the evenings and triggered several noise complaints. Graffiti also targeted the police in stark terms. One inscription on the wall of a historic building read, “A dead cop is a good cop,” beside the words “Fuck Police.” Police said they could not yet calculate the property damage.

The occupiers had already fortified themselves and barricaded the square when the police forces arrived.

· Karin RykartZurich’s security director explained why police did not immediately clear the occupation.

City police and Zurich Security Director Karin Rykart of the Green Party decided to tolerate the occupation after assessing the situation and consulting her. Police cited proportionality. Rykart later told the city parliament that officers arrived after the occupiers had fortified and barricaded the square. Clearing it would have required a forced entry and carried a risk of riots.

Rykart said preventing injuries on both sides had been the top priority. She also insisted that the assessment did not depend on the activists’ political position, noting that police had previously cleared occupations at Platzspitz and the barracks. The center-right camp rejected the decision. The Swiss People’s Party said left-wing extremists were being spared while conservatives faced restrictions on their political rights.

The police would have had to force their way in, with the risk that riots would occur.

· Karin RykartRykart cited the risk of violence as a reason for tolerating the occupation.
About this summary

Originally published by Neue Zürcher Zeitung in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.