Lindsey Graham is gone, Israel may never find another friend like him - comment
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The article reflects on the passing of US Senator Lindsey Graham, highlighting his deep support for Israel.
- Graham's foreign policy was described as stemming from a strong understanding of the region and its challenges.
- He expressed concerns about annexation and advised honesty in US-Israel relations, even while remaining a staunch defender of the Jewish state.
The passing of US Senator Lindsey Graham is noted with particular significance in Jewish tradition, which marks the departure of righteous individuals on Shabbat. The author reflects on Graham's profound connection to Israel, describing him as one of the few American senators known by name in the country.
If you want to marginalize the Jewish state, go down that road. It will do more damage to Israel's future than any bomb Iran could ever build.
Graham's commitment to Israel was evident in his repeated visits, even during wartime, and his willingness to speak directly to adversaries like Hezbollah. He articulated views on Israel's enemies that often mirrored sentiments expressed privately by Israeli officials. Israelis, the article suggests, viewed his support as a constant, much like they perceive broader American backing.
To be pro-Israel, you need to be honest with Israel.
In a conversation last fall, Graham expressed concern about the potential damage of annexation to Israel's future, stating, "If you want to marginalize the Jewish state, go down that road. It will do more damage to Israel's future than any bomb Iran could ever build." He emphasized the need for honesty in US-Israel relations, asserting, "To be pro-Israel, you need to be honest with Israel." This perspective aligned with private assessments from senior Israeli officials regarding the feasibility of pushing sovereignty in parts of the West Bank.
it will fall on Israel.
Despite his nuanced approach, Graham remained a fierce defender of Israel. He compared Hamas to a tiger incapable of change and warned that if an international force did not disarm the group, the responsibility would fall on Israel. He also addressed the rise of Israel-skeptical voices within his own party, distinguishing between fringe elements and mainstream political discourse.
Seventy-five beats twenty-five.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.