Local units defy federal school calendar; Bhaktapur follows suit

In a bold assertion of local autonomy, Bhaktapur Municipality has decided to uphold its established academic calendar, directly challenging a recent directive from the federal government. Mayor Sunil Prajapati articulated a clear stance, labeling the federal decision as "impractical" and highlighting the significant disruption it would cause to timely course completion. This move by Bhaktapur is not an isolated incident; it reflects a growing trend of local governments in Nepal prioritizing local needs and constitutional interpretations over federal mandates.

“

The federal decision on education was “impractical” and could not be implemented locally.

The core of the dispute lies in the federal government's attempt to impose additional holidays, which local bodies argue would severely curtail teaching days and compromise the quality of education. Bhaktapur's decision, supported by various educational organizations and parent associations, emphasizes the need for local consultation before such significant educational policies are enacted. This defiance underscores a broader debate about federalism and the division of powers, particularly concerning the constitutional authority of local governments in managing basic and secondary education.

“

He argued that adding 52 extra holidays in a year would make it difficult to complete the academic course on time.

What makes this situation particularly interesting from a Nepali perspective is the assertion of local governance power, a key tenet of the federal structure established after years of political transition. While Western media might focus on the disruption or the challenge to national unity, for many in Nepal, this is about empowering local communities to tailor education to their specific contexts and needs. The fact that multiple rural municipalities, like those in Tanahun and Pyuthan, are independently setting their academic schedules demonstrates a strong local resolve to manage educational affairs, signaling a potential shift in the balance of power between the center and the periphery.

“

He also said the federal government should not interfere in the constitutional authority of local governments and should consult them before making decisions.