Luxon's Government Has Severely Damaged Crown-Māori Ties, Argues Top Lawyer
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Former Attorney-General Chris Finlayson argues the government's recent changes to foreshore and seabed law have damaged the Crown-Māori relationship.
- Finlayson contends the law change, which makes it harder for iwi and hapū to gain customary title recognition, is a reaction to Māori successes, not a restoration of original intent.
- The opinion piece is an excerpt from a publication by the Helen Clark Foundation, featuring insights from leading New Zealand thinkers.
Former Attorney-General Chris Finlayson has sharply criticized the Christopher Luxon government's recent amendments to the foreshore and seabed law. He asserts these changes, which impede the recognition of customary title for iwi and hapū, represent a grave blow to the Crown-Māori relationship.
Finlayson, who previously served under Sir John Key and played a role in negotiating numerous Treaty settlements, disputes the government's claim that the legislation merely restores Parliament's original intention. Instead, he posits that the law change is a direct response to what he perceives as an excessive number of victories for Māori in asserting their rights.
This critical assessment is drawn from an abridged chapter within the Helen Clark Foundation's publication, "Facing Up to Our Future: Challenges and Choices for New Zealand." The collection features contributions from 21 prominent thinkers, offering diverse perspectives on the nation's future challenges. The chapter highlights the ongoing tension surrounding resource and cultural rights in New Zealand.
The Government says it is restoring the law to Parliament’s original intention. Former Attorney-General Christopher Finlayson says it is not, and is a response to Māori having had too many wins.
Originally published by NZ Herald in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.