DistantNews
Support us
'Markets, munitions and midterms' pushed Trump to Iran deal, Michael Doran says
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States /Economy & Trade

'Markets, munitions and midterms' pushed Trump to Iran deal, Michael Doran says

From PBS NewsHour · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Interview Named sources Context piece
  • Michael Doran, a former National Security Council staffer, disagrees with criticism that President Trump's deal with Iran is a "blunder."
  • Doran argues Trump has degraded Iran's capabilities more than any other president and that Iran's nuclear program has been effectively destroyed.
  • He believes the agreement buys the U.S. time to rearm and replenish stockpiles, giving it leverage over Iran.

Michael Doran, a former foreign policy official in the George W. Bush administration, offered a different perspective on President Trump's recent deal with Iran, pushing back against sharp criticism from some Republican quarters. Senator Bill Cassidy had labeled the framework deal a "blunder," stating it failed to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions and that Iran learned "threatening the Strait of Hormuz works."

Iran's nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works.

โ€” Senator Bill CassidyCriticism of the Trump administration's deal with Iran.

However, Doran expressed a more nuanced view, calling the situation a "mixed bag" but willing to "give the president the benefit of the doubt." He asserted that Trump has taken significant action against Iran and its proxies, citing operations like "Midnight Hammer" and "Epic Fury." Doran believes Trump has done "more to degrade Iran's capabilities than any other president," suggesting this warrants some leniency in evaluating the current agreement.

No, I don't agree with that. From my perspective, it's a mixed bag, but I'm willing to give the president the benefit of the doubt.

โ€” Michael DoranResponding to criticism of the Iran deal.

Addressing the core concerns about Iran's nuclear program, Doran stated that for all practical purposes, it "has been destroyed" and that Iran is not enriching uranium. He highlighted a key clause in the memorandum of understanding that maintains the nuclear status quo as long as negotiations are ongoing. This, he argued, is a fundamental shift from the situation since Iran began enriching uranium in 2006.

He's gone to war against Iran and its proxies three times just in this term, once against the Houthis, Operation Midnight Hammer, and now Epic Fury. I think he's really done more to degrade Iran's capabilities than any other president, and I think we should give him a little leeway.

โ€” Michael DoranJustifying his more lenient view of Trump's actions against Iran.

Doran also discussed the strategic implications of the deal, noting that it provides the U.S. with crucial time. This period allows for ships to depart the Persian Gulf, and for the U.S. to rearm and replenish its stockpiles in preparation for potential future actions if Iran fails to comply. While acknowledging that this timeline could also allow Iran to replenish its own resources, Doran believes the U.S. holds the upper hand, particularly given Iran's current inability to enrich uranium.

Well, what's fundamentally changed is that Iran's nuclear program has been destroyed, for all intents and purposes, and they're not enriching uranium.

โ€” Michael DoranExplaining the impact of the agreement on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by PBS NewsHour. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.