Massive Attack's Festival Performance Ignites Debate Over Political Messaging
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- British band Massive Attack projected images and played Seo Taiji and Boys' song 'Era of Doubt' at the Incheon Pentaport Rock Festival, linking South Korea's democracy movement to cultural resistance.
- The band's visuals included references to the 1980 Gwangju Uprising and critiques of current political leaders, sparking debate among festival-goers about the intersection of art and politics.
- While some criticized the political messaging as divisive, others supported the band's use of the festival stage to convey social and political commentary, including criticism of the Israel-Gaza conflict.
British band Massive Attack ignited controversy at the Incheon Pentaport Rock Festival by incorporating political messages into their performance. During their set on August 1, the band projected images and played "Era of Doubt," a song by South Korean artist Seo Taiji and Boys, linking it to the nation's struggle for democracy.
K-pop was born during a time of resistance against dictatorship and corruption.
The visuals included footage of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, with accompanying text that, while containing minor inaccuracies about U.S. involvement, framed the event as a catalyst for cultural resistance. "Era of Doubt," originally released in 1995, was presented as a song of defiance against an irresponsible establishment, a sentiment that resonated with the audience who sang along.
Massive Attack, known for their consistent social activism, has been using similar visuals on their world tour, connecting the Gwangju movement to the emergence of K-pop and later artists. The band concluded their performance with a message questioning the loss of cultural political power and the need for new music to challenge corrupt regimes, displaying images of leaders like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
In 1980, the United States aided the civilian massacre committed by the South Korean government in Gwangju. Numerous citizens were killed. As a result, resistance movements demanding democracy intensified, and new music expressing new forms of cultural resistance emerged.
However, the performance drew sharp criticism online, with some viewers labeling it as "political agitation and distortion" and questioning the appropriateness of political messages at a rock festival. Conversely, many defended the band, expressing that it was disheartening that some South Koreans distort their own history, making foreign artists seem more insightful. The debate highlights a division in how the public perceives the role of art in political discourse.
Is culture losing its political power thirty years later? Where is the new music to ignite resistance? Against old and corrupt power.
Beyond the Gwangju Uprising, Massive Attack also displayed a Palestinian flag, criticizing Israel's actions in Gaza, and touched upon themes of algorithmic control. A German-Korean attendee, S, expressed support for the band's message, stating that "all art has a message" and that music naturally conveys political ideas. S also noted the contrast between discussions on the Palestine issue in Germany and its relative absence in South Korea, expressing joy at seeing solidarity at the festival.
I don't understand why this is becoming a controversy.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.