Middle Israel: Why Is Sara Netanyahu Going to War Against Yair Golan?
Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- The opinion column compares Sara Netanyahuโs insinuation about Yair Golan with Menachem Beginโs earlier exaggeration of the Altalena arms shipment.
- Sara Netanyahu questioned Golanโs account of fighting on October 7 and suggested he had arrived unusually early, prompting the columnist to characterize the claim as conspiratorial.
- The column describes Golan as a politically flawed but patriotic figure who rushed to the western Negev after learning of the Hamas massacre.
Menachem Begin once turned the defeat of the Altalena arms ship into what he presented as a moral victory. In a 1948 radio address, he told his men not to join a civil war and claimed the damaged vessel had carried โ10,000 aerial bombs.โ Had those bombs joined the rifles and machine guns, he said, Israel might have reached the Jordan and perhaps beyond it.
The claim, the column notes, was far-fetched. Begin had also suggested that the โship of salvationโ could decide the fate of the war. In reality, the Altalenaโs cargo represented only a fraction of the weapons David Ben-Gurion had already secured through a major arms deal with Czechoslovakia. The Haganah had also obtained and manufactured thousands of additional weapons before 1948.
10,000 aerial bombs
That reshaping of historical facts came to mind after Sara Netanyahuโs interview this week with Channel 14. Speaking about Yair Golan, leader of the Democrats Party, she said: โYou claim you fought on October 7.โ She pointed out that Golan had been there, dressed and ready, early that morning, while the prime minister did not know.
You claim you fought on October 7.
When asked whether there had been treason that day, Sara Netanyahu did not dismiss the idea. She replied, โI donโt want to talk.โ The columnist says she nevertheless made the insinuation clear: Golan had advance knowledge of Hamasโs invasion and was somehow part of it.
The column does not portray Golan as an exceptional political strategist. It says he has made outrageous statements and appears unaware of his partyโs domestic agenda and history. Many voters therefore do not see him as a suitable candidate for prime minister. But, it argues, political shortcomings do not make him a villain or a traitor. A former deputy IDF chief of staff, Golan rushed to the western Negev after news of the massacre emerged, and the column describes him as a major-league patriot.
I donโt want to talk.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.