Military strikes on water facilities in Iran may constitute a war crime, experts say
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Military strikes that damaged two water storage facilities in southern Iran may constitute a war crime, according to military and legal experts.
- The strike on Bemani on June 10 destroyed a key water reservoir serving approximately 20,000 people.
- Experts are examining whether the water tanks were deliberately targeted or unintentionally hit, which is critical for determining legality.
Military strikes damaging two water storage facilities in southern Iran could be considered a war crime, experts suggest. The assessment follows a review of media reports and visual evidence of a June 10 strike on Bemani, a district near the Strait of Hormuz.
The strike impacted a crucial water reservoir that serves around 20,000 residents in the area, which is already experiencing a severe drought. It remains unclear if the water tanks were the intended targets or if they were hit accidentally.
Brian Finucane, a former State Department lawyer, emphasized that the intent behind the strike is legally significant. He stated that if the tanks were the target, the situation becomes critical, as attacking civilian objects is unlawful, while military objectives are lawful. The damage to the infrastructure raises serious questions about adherence to international humanitarian law amid the ongoing conflict.
Itโs either a military objective or itโs a civilian object: attacking one is lawful, attacking the other is not.
Originally published by The Guardian. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.