Minister's actions stir Nepal's education sector, clarity on reforms still pending

Nepal's Education and Sports Minister Sasmit Pokharel has completed his first 100 days in office, a period marked by some early reform efforts alongside significant questions about his leadership and administrative approach. While the ministry points to achievements like the earlier-than-usual publication of Secondary Education Examination and Grade 12 results, a curriculum review, and policy reforms, education stakeholders argue that substantive progress on long-term structural changes remains elusive.

Critics, including education experts and stakeholders, contend that the ministry has prioritized headline-grabbing announcements over essential legislative reforms for school and higher education, teacher management, university governance, and federal coordination. Pokharel, who also serves as government spokesperson, has faced criticism for several decisions and public statements, with some accusing the ministry of making hasty, poorly considered decisions without adequate consultation. This has led to dissatisfaction across the sector.

The recent Grade 12 examination results have intensified scrutiny, with thousands of students questioning score accuracy and demanding the minister's resignation. Although the faster turnaround for results was praised, it has raised concerns about the evaluation process's credibility. Supporters, however, highlight budget allocations for education, systemic reform initiatives, and plans for autism schools in every province as accomplishments.

Education experts emphasize that in a sector as sensitive as education, the direction of reform is more critical than its pace. Pokharel's initial decision to ban "entrance preparation" and "bridge course" classes for students up to Grade 12 immediately sparked controversy. The minister's tenure is now being assessed not just on achievements but on his leadership style, decision-making, and long-term vision, with a call for a focus on effective implementation and institutional change over quick, visible outcomes.