Ministry Rejects Usage Permit for Kablar Viewpoint in Čačak Due to Documentation Issues
Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Serbia's Ministry of Construction has rejected the City of Čačak's request for a usage permit for the Kablar viewpoint.
- The ministry cited several unmet formal requirements, including proof of pedestrian path construction and quality control programs.
- Missing documentation and incomplete project details were highlighted as reasons for the rejection.
Serbia's Ministry of Construction, Transport, and Infrastructure has rejected the City of Čačak's application for a usage permit for the Kablar viewpoint. The decision, reported by eKapija, cites numerous formal deficiencies in the submitted documentation.
The city, acting as the investor, sought approval for the use of the constructed works. However, the ministry found that critical requirements were not met. These included a lack of proof that pedestrian paths and the access road to the public thoroughfare were completed, as well as missing quality control programs and geodetic survey projects.
Further issues noted in the rejection decision include the absence of responsible contractors and supervisors in the investor's, expert supervision's, and contractor's statements. The main project documentation also lacked a signed decision on the appointment of the chief designer by the investor. Additionally, the documentation did not list all attached projects and contained future-tense terms like "planned" or "foreseen" when describing infrastructure connections and the object's summary, failing to specify what was actually built.
The ministry also pointed out that the report from the technical inspection commission's cover page was missing the date and report number. The commission's minutes failed to list the names of all contractors, responsible contractors, and supervision personnel, along with their respective companies. The report also lacked a description of changes made during construction or deviations from the original building and execution designs. The final calculated value was also missing from the main documentation.
Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.