Minority Caucus Accuses Reps’ Spokesperson of Misrepresenting House in Defence of Executive
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Nigeria's House of Representatives Minority Caucus accused a spokesperson of misrepresenting the legislature's views when defending the executive branch.
- The caucus demanded a public apology within 72 hours, citing procedural concerns and the need for legislative independence from the presidency.
- They also raised alarms about underfunding for defense and security agencies, hindering their capacity to address national threats.
Nigeria's House of Representatives is embroiled in a dispute as the Minority Caucus accuses the Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Akin Rotimi, of overstepping his bounds. The caucus insists Rotimi improperly claimed to speak for the entire House while defending the executive branch, an action they argue undermines the legislature's independence.
the legislature must maintain its independence and not function as a “lapdog” to the presidency.
According to a statement by caucus spokesperson Afam Ogene, the controversy stems from a press conference where Rotimi responded to the Minority Caucus's call for President Bola Tinubu to suspend political activities and implement a National Security and Economic Recovery Plan. The caucus contends that Rotimi's defense misrepresented the House's collective stance, emphasizing that no resolution authorized his position.
The Minority Caucus highlighted procedural irregularities, criticizing Rotimi's use of "House Notes" when the House had not convened since June 15. They cited constitutional duties, referencing Sections 14(2)(b) and 88, to assert that their primary role is accountability, not defending the presidency. The caucus has issued an ultimatum, demanding a public apology from Rotimi within 72 hours or facing a petition to the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges.
The lawmakers emphasised that no resolution or decision of the House authorised such a position.
Beyond the procedural conflict, the caucus expressed deep concern over the alleged failure to implement budgets since 2024. They claim that funding for critical defense and security agencies remains below 30 percent, significantly impairing their ability to combat national threats. This financial grievance adds another layer to the growing tensions within the House.
their primary responsibility is to hold the Executive accountable, not to offer unsolicited defences of its actions.
Originally published by Premium Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.