More than half of asylum seekers rejected under tightened laws will remain in UK
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The UK Home Office's own assessment indicates that over half of asylum seekers whose claims are rejected under new human rights laws will still be allowed to remain in the country.
- The proposed immigration and asylum bill includes a ยฃ10,000 fee for settled status, a new appeals system without judges, and restrictions on trafficking claims.
- Refugee Council argues the bill will create bureaucracy and chaos, urging the government to address the poor quality of initial asylum decisions instead of implementing quick fixes.
The UK Home Office's assessment reveals a significant loophole in its planned asylum reforms: more than half of the individuals whose claims are rejected under tightened human rights laws are expected to remain in the country. The government's impact assessment projects that out of an estimated 11,700 additional refusals due to changes in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 55% will still be granted the right to stay.
It would create a whole new architecture of bureaucracy for the Home Office by building a new appeals system and imposing an unfair extra tax on refugees, while ignoring the poor quality of initial decisions that is actually driving significant delays and costs.
These reforms are part of a broader immigration and asylum bill introduced to Parliament. The legislation proposes controversial measures such as charging asylum seekers ยฃ10,000 for settled status, establishing a new appeals system that bypasses judges, and imposing new restrictions on trafficking claims. The bill aims to create a "firm but fair" asylum system and reduce incentives for illegal migration.
Like generations of refugees before them, all they want is to settle and stand on their own two feet, finding work in our NHS, our care homes and on our high streets.
However, critics argue the proposed changes will lead to administrative chaos. Imran Hussain, director of external affairs at the Refugee Council, stated that the bill would create "a whole new architecture of bureaucracy" by introducing a new appeals system and an "unfair extra tax on refugees." He emphasized that the core issue driving delays and costs is the poor quality of initial asylum decisions, which the bill fails to address. Hussain urged the government to focus on improving the initial decision-making process rather than implementing measures that could cause long-term disruption.
If the government is serious about building a fair and functioning asylum system, it must start by breaking the cycle of quick fixes and bills that create long term chaos.
Originally published by The Guardian. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.