Mother convicted of manslaughter after daughter died in fire

A Swedish mother has been found guilty of manslaughter and unlawful deprivation of liberty following the death of her five-year-old daughter in an apartment fire on Hisingen. The district court sentenced the woman to six years in prison, concluding that she repeatedly endangered her child by leaving her alone and locked in their home over several years.

The fire, which occurred in February, is believed to have been started by the young girl playing with lighters left in her bedroom. The mother was reportedly staying overnight at her boyfriend's residence when the incident occurred. Investigators found that this was not an isolated instance of the child being left unattended; the prosecution alleged that the woman had deprived her child of liberty unlawfully at least 41 times prior to the fatal fire.

Surveillance cameras installed by the mother in the apartment transmitted images of smoke development to her mobile phone. Although she rushed home upon seeing the alerts and called emergency services, it was too late to save her daughter. The court determined that the mother acted with gross negligence, bordering on intent, due to her conscious awareness of the risks involved. This conscious risk-taking was deemed sufficiently reckless to warrant a conviction for gross negligence resulting in death.

Despite documented mental health issues, including PTSD and depression, the court found the mother was not suffering from a psychological disorder that would absolve her of responsibility. She has not confessed or denied the charges, citing a lack of clear memory of the events. Meanwhile, social services in Hisingen had been alerted multiple times regarding the conditions surrounding the child, including police calls related to parental disputes and suspicions of the child being left alone. However, no formal investigations were initiated on those occasions. The social services agency has since reported itself under Lex Sarah, and the supervisory authority Ivo will review the case.

“

Overall, the actions constituted conscious risk-taking and were so negligent that the accused must be convicted of gross negligence resulting in death.