Mother's Plea for Compensation After Daughter's Crane Death Met with Cold Response, Court Promises Empathy Training
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A mother is seeking compensation after her 18-year-old daughter died in a traffic accident involving a crane.
- The court initially ruled against the mother, stating that insurance payouts covered damages, but the mother claims the insurance amount was less than stated.
- The court acknowledged the mother's distress and stated it would remind judges to communicate with empathy, while also noting the appeal will be heard by a panel of judges.
An 18-year-old motorcyclist's death has sparked a legal battle and public outcry over the handling of the case. The mother of the deceased, Cai, is seeking compensation from the engineering company that the crane operator was affiliated with after her daughter was crushed by a crane.
The initial ruling by the Taipei District Court's small claims division found in favor of the company. The court determined that the 2.97 million New Taiwan dollars in damages, including 2 million for mental distress and 890,000 for funeral expenses, were covered by insurance payouts. However, the court stated that the mother had already received 7 million NT dollars from compulsory insurance, leaving no remaining claim.
The mother disputes the insurance amount, stating she only received 2 million NT dollars. She recently spoke to the media, recounting her experience in court where she felt the judge treated her coldly. She recalled asking, "Did my daughter sacrifice herself in vain?" and claimed the judge responded, "Yes."
In response to the public attention, the Taipei District Court issued a statement expressing regret for the victim's death and the family's suffering. The court acknowledged that the judge's remarks may have caused the mother further pain and humiliation. The court stated it would use this case as a lesson to remind judges to communicate with caution, gentleness, clarity, and empathy. The court emphasized that the ruling was based on legal requirements for damages and not a devaluation of the victim's life. The case is now headed to a three-judge panel for a hearing.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.