Moving past a ceasefire: Recognizing Israel is a big step, but 'normal,' says Lebanese diplomat

A new US-brokered framework agreement between Israel and Lebanon marks a significant step toward stabilizing the region, though the broader architecture remains complex and unsettled. The agreement, signed on June 28, 2026, aims for a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory contingent upon the verified disarmament of Hezbollah and the restoration of the Lebanese state's exclusive authority over force.

This framework operates within a larger diplomatic effort by Washington to manage regional confrontations, particularly with Tehran. A separate US-Iran memorandum of understanding, or MOU, provides a 60-day window for negotiations on terms including nuclear restrictions, sanctions relief, and halting hostilities across regional fronts. However, the distinct approaches to Iran and Hezbollah highlight a central contradiction in US regional diplomacy.

While the US-Iran track seeks Tehran's participation in de-escalation, the Israel-Lebanon framework implicitly sidelines Iran's influence in Lebanon. It frames Hezbollah not as a resistance force but as the primary impediment to Lebanese statehood and Israeli security. This approach also signals a broader political shift, emphasizing Lebanese sovereignty and the disarmament of non-state armed groups.

The agreement tackles Lebanon's most sensitive modern political issue: whether the state, not Hezbollah, holds the sole authority to decide on war and peace. For Israel, the critical concern is ensuring any withdrawal is not undermined by unfulfilled previous arrangements. Sarit Zehavi, founder of the Alma Center, noted that the most crucial details, particularly regarding security arrangements and the pilot-zone mechanism, may remain unpublished within the MOU.

“

It’s an MOU, so not all details are published. It seems like there is another part of the agreement that was not published, which is the security part.