DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore /Culture & Society

Musk's X Accuses Australia of Undermining International Law Over Social Media Ban Enforcement

From The Straits Times · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Elon Musk's X platform accused Australia of undermining international law with its new social media regulations for under-16s.
  • X argues that proposed powers for Australia's eSafety Commissioner overstep boundaries and conflict with international legal principles.
  • The dispute highlights geopolitical tensions over online content regulation, with a U.S. congressional committee also scrutinizing Australia's approach.

Elon Musk's X platform has accused Australia of attempting to grant its internet regulator excessive information-gathering powers and undermining U.S. law through its stringent enforcement of a ban on social media for users under 16. Australia's pioneering law, enacted in December, has drawn criticism from mostly U.S.-based social media companies.

The plans did not give "due regard to procedural fairness, privacy, the broader impacts on online services, and Australia's digital economy".

โ€” XX's submission to an Australian senate committee regarding proposed regulatory changes.

X contends that Australia's proposed changes fail to "give due regard to procedural fairness, privacy, the broader impacts on online services, and Australia's digital economy." In a submission to an Australian senate committee, X specifically targeted plans to expand the eSafety Commissioner's rights for document discovery and double the maximum fine to A$99 million ($69 million).

The platform argued that these changes would "compel any person outside Australia... to provide information and documents merely because they are 'affiliated' with a company," which it described as being "in clear conflict" with international legal principles. X further stated that the amendment "raises potential for a severe impact on international comity," referring to respect for foreign legal systems.

The changes would "compel any person outside Australia ... to provide information and documents merely because they are 'affiliated' with a company," a move it described as being "in clear conflict" with international legal principles.

โ€” XX's argument against Australia's proposed expansion of information-gathering powers for its internet regulator.

This controversy has escalated into a geopolitical issue, with a U.S. congressional committee already requesting the eSafety Commissioner to testify, accusing her of jeopardizing American free speech. Musk himself previously criticized the Australian ban as a "backdoor way to control access to the internet by all Australians."

The amendment "raises potential for a severe impact on international comity".

โ€” XX's statement on the potential consequences of Australia's regulatory amendments on international relations.

Data indicates most Australian teenagers under 16 still possess social media accounts despite the ban. eSafety has announced potential enforcement lawsuits against five platforms but faces challenges due to its limited powers. The regulator noted its current inability to compel documents from third-party age verification providers creates "significant" barriers to investigations. The proposed legislative changes are pending parliamentary approval, with the senate committee expected to deliver its findings on August 25.

The billionaire Musk himself called the Australian social media ban a "backdoor way to control access to the internet by all Australians" in an earlier post on X.

โ€” Elon MuskElon Musk's previous statement criticizing Australia's social media ban.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Straits Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.