DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Culture & Society

My companion dog is a 'dangerous dog'

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

In-depth Sources not specified Context piece
  • The author adopted a pit bull mix named 'Aegi,' legally classified as a 'dangerous dog' in South Korea.
  • The article criticizes South Korea's inadequate regulations against dog fighting and the inconsistent treatment of 'dangerous dogs.'
  • It argues that societal issues, not breed alone, contribute to dog bite incidents and calls for systemic reform.

The author, Lee Hyung-ju, director of the Animal Welfare Research Institute 'Aware,' recounts adopting a pit bull mix named 'Aegi.' He encountered Aegi while volunteering in a village where dogs were kept chained, often bearing scars from dogfighting. Despite the law designating five breeds, including pit bulls, as 'dangerous dogs,' South Korea lacks specific penalties for breeding or raising dogs for fighting. This contrasts sharply with countries like the United States, where dogfighting activities carry severe penalties.

We have no legal provisions to punish the act of breeding or raising dogs for the purpose of dogfighting.

โ€” Lee Hyung-juLee Hyung-ju explaining the legal loopholes in South Korea regarding dogfighting.

Aegi, who was not suited for fighting and showed affection despite injuries, was adopted by Lee. However, living with a 'dangerous dog' presents ongoing challenges. Owners must obtain permits, undergo annual training, and secure insurance. Even without a history of aggression, dogs can be subject to temperament evaluations that could lead to euthanasia. While these breeds require significant exercise, they face scrutiny and restrictions in public spaces, even when muzzled.

It is contradictory to allow the birth of dangerous dogs if society has designated certain breeds as dangerous.

โ€” Lee Hyung-juLee Hyung-ju criticizing South Korea's policy on 'dangerous dogs'.

Lee criticizes the contradiction in South Korea's policy: strictly controlling existing 'dangerous dogs' while permitting their breeding and sale. He notes that 'dangerous dogs' surrendered to shelters often face euthanasia, a harsh reality for animals branded as dangerous from birth. This creates a difficult situation for owners who can no longer care for their pets, as finding new homes is nearly impossible.

Expecting a reduction in dog bite incidents by only managing specific breeds is something we should be wary of.

โ€” Lee Hyung-juLee Hyung-ju questioning the effectiveness of breed-specific legislation.

The article argues that focusing solely on specific breeds to reduce dog bite incidents is misguided. Many reported incidents involve dogs breaking free from tethers or pulling out stakes, suggesting that inadequate living conditions and lack of socialization are significant factors. Lee concludes that the responsibility lies not with dogs like Aegi, who are labeled 'dangerous' simply by birth, but with a system that permits organized dogfighting and fails to implement effective regulations and penalties.

Isn't the problem with the system that allows continuous breeding and distribution while designating them as dangerous breeds?

โ€” Lee Hyung-juLee Hyung-ju pointing to systemic flaws in regulating 'dangerous dogs'.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.