DistantNews
Support us
🇮🇱 Israel

My Word: It’s a funny old world - opinion

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • Ireland's government purchased a €53 million plane but omitted essential FalconEye technology, reportedly due to a refusal to award defense contracts to Israeli companies.
  • The decision has been criticized as irrational antisemitism, grounding the aircraft in frequent bad weather rather than using Israeli technology.
  • The article contrasts this with other Israeli contributions and suggests the boycott may extend to other sectors, impacting Ireland and the world.

Ireland's government has purchased a €53 million aircraft intended for official state business, but notably excluded the FalconEye technology. This advanced system, co-developed by Dassault Falcon and Israeli defense giant Elbit Systems, is crucial for the plane's ability to land in foggy weather. The decision stems from Ireland's reluctance to award defense contracts to Israeli companies, a move the article's author labels as a "crash course in the irrationality of antisemitism."

Talk about a crash course in the irrationality of antisemitism. It’s not the fog that’s preventing them from seeing clearly. It’s blind hatred.

— Liat CollinThe author's commentary on Ireland's decision to omit Israeli technology from a government plane.

The author argues that this decision is not about fog preventing clear vision, but rather "blind hatred." While acknowledging that some countries might withdraw from events like the Eurovision Song Contest due to political stances, the article highlights the extreme nature of grounding a government aircraft in adverse weather conditions to avoid utilizing Israeli technology. This is particularly pointed out given that Irish officials reportedly still use Airbus helicopters and maritime patrol aircraft equipped with Elbit avionics, suggesting the politicians themselves are the primary risk.

It’s one thing for countries like Ireland to pull out of the Eurovision Song Contest because they didn’t want to share the stage with an Israeli singer. (It was no great loss to the Eurovision or to Ireland, which, unlike Israel, has fared poorly in the music competition in recent years.) It’s another thing to literally ground your government in frequent bad weather rather than permit Israeli technology to save the day.

— Liat CollinContrasting Ireland's stance on Eurovision with the decision regarding the government aircraft.

The piece suggests that Ireland's officials are overlooking numerous Israeli contributions in technology, health, and agriculture. The author implies that a comprehensive boycott of Israeli products could deprive the country and the world of significant advancements, likening the situation to Ireland losing its way by boycotting Israeli-invented WAZE and questioning their moral compass.

The Irish reportedly still use Airbus helicopters and maritime patrol aircraft fitted with Elbit avionics, so maybe the joke really is on the government – it’s only the politicians who are at risk.

— Liat CollinHighlighting the perceived inconsistency in Ireland's use of Israeli technology.

Recent events, particularly the allegations of "genocide" in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas-led attack, have intensified Irish indignation towards Israel. The article contends that accusations against Israel began before its response to the Hamas incursion, which resulted in 1,220 deaths and 251 hostages. It dismisses the "baby-killer" narrative as a deeply entrenched blood libel, citing a UNICEF-led report that allegedly shows low malnutrition rates in Gaza, comparable to pre-conflict levels.

Maybe they lost their way boycotting Israeli-invented WAZE. They’ve certainly lost their moral compass.

— Liat CollinCriticizing Ireland's broader boycott efforts and their implications.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.