My Word: Mending fences in good faith - opinion

A "Trilateral Framework" agreement signed between Israel, Lebanon, and the United States has been characterized as a diplomatic "mini-earthquake" in a positive sense. This accord aims to revive the spirit of the historical "Good Fence" that once facilitated cross-border interactions between Israelis and Lebanese citizens.

The "Good Fence" policy, established in 1976 during the Lebanese Civil War, allowed Lebanese citizens access to Israel for medical treatment and employment. The crossing near Metula became a symbol of this cross-border relationship until Israel's withdrawal in 2000.

This new framework is presented as a breath of fresh air, particularly following a recent memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran. A key distinction highlighted is the direct involvement of Israel and Lebanon as sovereign parties in the negotiations, symbolized by the presence of both flags in the room. This contrasts with the Iran MoU, where terms affecting Lebanon and Israel were perceived as externally imposed.

Significant achievements of the Israel-Lebanon agreement include sidelining Iran, a major financial backer of Hezbollah, and the absence of French involvement, which could be interpreted as a sign of Lebanese independence. While the agreement was functional rather than festive, with officials acknowledging future challenges, it represents a notable step in regional diplomacy.