NASA defends all-male crew for Artemis III moon mission
Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- NASA Administrator Bill Nelson defended the all-male crew selection for the Artemis III lunar mission.
- Nelson stated the chosen crew offers the best chance for mission success, citing extensive criteria and deep talent within NASA.
- The Artemis III mission aims to return humans to the Moon and establish a base, paving the way for Mars missions amid global space competition.
NASA Administrator Bill Nelson has defended the selection of an all-male crew for the upcoming Artemis III lunar mission, responding to disappointment and outrage expressed by some observers. Nelson stated on the social network X that the chosen astronauts represent the crew with the "best prospects for success."
"In a world with so many controversies, I hope this can be a moment when we celebrate the astronauts who have been selected, respect the integrity of the process, and recognize the exceptional depth of talent across the entire corps," Nelson wrote. He emphasized that the selection was based on numerous criteria, ultimately choosing the crew that "gives the mission the best chance of achieving its goals."
Nelson acknowledged the significant number of "outstanding female astronauts and other women employees" within the American space agency. This statement comes after astronaut Christina Koch was part of the Artemis II crew, becoming the first woman to orbit the Moon. The absence of women in the Artemis III mission, which plans to land humans on the Moon, has drawn criticism from space exploration enthusiasts worldwide.
The Artemis program's overarching goal is to return humans to the Moon and establish a permanent U.S. base on its surface. This objective is intended to facilitate future missions to Mars, occurring within a context of intensifying global competition for military, commercial, and scientific advantages in space.
Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.