Nepal journalist's arrest sparks press freedom vs. privacy debate

Kishor Shrestha, editor-in-chief of Nepal's Jana Aastha weekly, faces criminal charges following his arrest on Wednesday. The detention has ignited a fierce debate, dividing opinions on the balance between press freedom and an individual's right to privacy.

Shrestha's arrest stems from a report published on August 5, which included a photograph of Amarkant Chaudhary, a member of the House of Representatives, kissing another woman. The woman who filed the complaint alleged an offense against her personal privacy, stating she had shared the photograph on her Facebook page. The detention warrant explicitly cites her complaint as the basis for Shrestha's custody for investigation.

The dispute extends beyond the journalistic merit of the report. It probes the appropriate legal route when published material allegedly infringes on privacy. The core question is when such a complaint warrants media regulation and when it escalates to a criminal justice matter. The Federation of Nepali Journalists has condemned the arrest, labeling it an assault on press freedom. They cite Nepal's laws, including the Constitution, the Journalists' Code of Conduct, and the Press Council Act, which guarantee press freedom and outline the Press Council's mechanisms for handling violations. These mechanisms include requiring responses, corrections, apologies, or publishing aggrieved parties' comments. For repeated offenses, the Council can recommend withdrawing government facilities or publicly express disapproval.

“

...on the complaint filed by [name omitted], in the case relating to an offence against personal privacy in which the Government of Nepal is the plaintiff and you are the defendant, it being necessary to keep you in police custody for investigation, you are hereby given this detention warrant and shall be kept in police custody from today’s date.