Netanyahu Rejects Gaza Plan, Distances Himself From Trump Again
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the US plan for Gaza, demanding Hamas's total disarmament before any Israeli withdrawal.
- The Israeli prime minister distanced himself from Donald Trump's proposal, emphasizing his own conditions for peace.
- The move signals a potential rift with the US administration and complicates efforts to de-escalate the conflict.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has firmly rejected the United States' proposed plan for Gaza, signaling a significant divergence from the Trump administration's approach. Netanyahu declared that Israel will not agree to any deal that does not include the complete disarmament of Hamas. This condition must be met before any Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
Netanyahu's stance directly counters the framework presented by the US, which reportedly aimed to outline a path toward a ceasefire and eventual peace. By publicly disavowing the plan and setting his own non-negotiable terms, the Israeli leader is once again distancing himself from former President Donald Trump. This public disagreement highlights potential friction between Netanyahu's government and key international players involved in mediating the conflict.
Israel will not agree to any deal that does not include the total disarmament of Hamas.
The prime minister's office stated that Israel's security needs and the demand for Hamas's disarmament are paramount. This firm position underscores the deep divisions on how to achieve stability in the region and raises questions about the viability of current diplomatic efforts. The rejection suggests that a resolution to the ongoing conflict will require significant concessions from multiple parties, with Israel unwilling to compromise on its core security demands.
We will not agree to a deal that does not include the total disarmament of Hamas.
Originally published by La Naciรณn in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.