DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Crime & Justice

Netanyahu's corruption trial continues amid pending delay requests

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial continued Tuesday, with his defense requesting a delay due to his military secretary's transition to Mossad chief.
  • The prosecution is focusing on Case 2000, which involves alleged discussions between Netanyahu and a media publisher about a quid pro quo for favorable coverage.
  • Netanyahu denies all charges, which include bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, stemming from indictments in 2019.

The criminal trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu proceeded on Tuesday, with the defense team having requested a delay in proceedings. The prime minister's legal team sought to postpone hearings scheduled for Tuesdays, citing the transition of his military secretary, Maj.-Gen. Roman Gofman, to the role of Mossad chief. The High Court of Justice had only recently cleared Gofman's appointment after a significant legal challenge.

During the court session, Netanyahu informed the judges that he would need to leave by 11:15 a.m., to which the judges agreed to try and accommodate. The trial is currently in the critical cross-examination phase. This stage of the proceedings unfolds against the backdrop of sensitive developments concerning Iran and while an offer from President Isaac Herzog for plea bargain negotiations remains on the table.

Netanyahu faces charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in three separate cases, to which he has pleaded not guilty. The prosecution's questioning is heavily focused on Case 2000. This case centers on alleged conversations between Netanyahu and Arnon โ€œNoniโ€ Mozes, publisher of Yediot Aharonot, prior to the 2015 elections. Prosecutors contend that Netanyahu, then prime minister, allegedly exploited his position to negotiate a deal for favorable coverage in exchange for actions that would weaken Yediot Aharonot's competitor, Israel Hayom.

The defense argues that Netanyahu never intended to finalize any deal with Mozes, asserting that the conversations were an attempt to expose or neutralize Mozes. They also maintain that politicians frequently engage with media figures and that the discussions did not constitute a criminal act. The case relies significantly on recorded conversations from late 2014, made by Netanyahu's former chief of staff, Ari Harow, who subsequently became a state witness.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.