DistantNews
Support us

Netanyahu’s cross-examination concludes after year-long testimony phase

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cross-examination in his criminal trial concluded after nearly a year of questioning.
  • The focus was on Case 2000, involving alleged quid pro quo with Yediot Aharonot publisher Arnon Mozes for favorable coverage.
  • Netanyahu's testimony is not over; he will face questioning from co-defendants' attorneys before his defense team re-examines him.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cross-examination in his criminal trial ended Tuesday, marking a significant milestone after nearly a year of questioning. The proceedings, which have captivated Israel, are now moving into the final phase of his testimony.

Tuesday's session concentrated on Case 2000, which alleges a quid pro quo arrangement between Netanyahu and Arnon Mozes, publisher of Yediot Aharonot. Netanyahu faces charges of fraud and breach of trust, while Mozes is accused of offering a bribe. The indictment claims Mozes offered to improve Netanyahu's coverage in his publications and diminish coverage of political rivals in exchange for the prime minister's influence to restrict the circulation of Israel Hayom, a free daily newspaper that competed with Yediot Aharonot.

I wanted to reach an understanding with him on a softened law.

— Benjamin NetanyahuExplaining his discussions with Arnon Mozes regarding legislation affecting Yediot Aharonot.

During questioning by Deputy State Attorney Yonatan Tadmor, Netanyahu addressed his December 2014 meetings with Mozes and the late Sheldon Adelson, owner of Israel Hayom. Tadmor suggested Netanyahu sought to soften the impact of legislation targeting Israel Hayom to appease Mozes. However, Netanyahu rejected this, stating his discussions with Adelson concerned the potential sale of Yediot Aharonot and Ynet. He characterized his talks with Mozes as part of a political dispute over Israel Hayom, not a criminal conspiracy. Netanyahu asserted that any softened legislation would only be relevant post-election and contingent on the next coalition, adding that Mozes was free to interpret the discussions as he wished.

Confronted with a police statement suggesting he aimed to

Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.

— Benjamin NetanyahuResponding to a prosecutor's interpretation of his strategy in dealing with Mozes.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.