DistantNews
Support us

New rules outlaw forced haircuts at schools, but schools aren’t convinced

From Kathmandu Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Approved/passed
  • A new amendment to Nepal's education regulations now prohibits schools from forcibly cutting students' hair without consent, protecting personal appearance rights.
  • The change followed a petition by 18-year-old Sambriddha Karki, who experienced mental harassment over his hair length, gaining significant public support.
  • Despite the new rules, many schools in Kathmandu continue the practice, with students reporting unofficial pressure to conform to appearance standards.

Eighteen-year-old Sambriddha Karki faced persistent mental harassment at his school in Kathmandu for having hair that was deemed too long by authorities. For months, he and his peers were subjected to punishments like being barred from class or having their identity cards confiscated, all under the guise of maintaining a "professional look."

They were giving me a lot of mental harassment for getting my hair cut.

— Sambriddha KarkiDescribing his experience with forced haircuts at school.

Frustrated by the arbitrary rules, Karki decided to challenge the practice by filing a petition through SpeakUp Nepal, a civic platform. The petition quickly garnered 250 signatures, the threshold for a complaint to become a public campaign. Kritika Ghimire, project manager at SpeakUp Nepal, noted that the public's response indicated the issue resonated deeply, signifying "this wasn’t just one student’s experience."

Over approximately 19 months, Karki's petition moved through various educational authorities, culminating in the tenth amendment to the education regulations on July 3. This amendment explicitly forbids schools and colleges from forcibly cutting students' hair without their consent. It also extends protections to students' personal appearance, prohibiting discrimination or harassment based on hairstyles, body image, or makeup, and outlawing physical and mental harassment conducted in the name of school discipline.

We don’t decide which petitions deserve attention. That’s decided by the public.

— Kritika GhimireProject manager at SpeakUp Nepal, explaining the platform's process.

This amendment marks the first legal provision affirming that a student's appearance is their own right, not subject to institutional control. However, the practical implementation faces challenges. Weeks after the amendment's passage, Karki reports that many schools and colleges in Kathmandu have not ceased the practice, with some unofficially compelling students to adhere to traditional appearance norms.

That was the moment we realised this wasn’t just one student’s experience as hundreds of people were saying, ‘This matters to us.’

— Kritika GhimireOn the public response to Sambriddha Karki's petition.

Ariana, a student at Budhanilkantha School (who requested anonymity), shared that even without explicit rules on appearance, her school imposes expectations on girls regarding tied hair, no makeup, and avoiding mehendi. This suggests that while the law addresses forced haircuts, broader issues of unequal freedoms and expectations related to personal appearance persist within educational institutions.

Many schools are still not following it. Only one or two colleges have stopped it, but unofficially, they are still compelling students.

— Sambriddha KarkiReporting on the continued practice of forced haircuts in schools after the amendment.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Kathmandu Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.