New USCIS rules send asylum cases directly to immigration judges, lawyers explain implications
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- USCIS will now be able to refer certain affirmative asylum claims directly to immigration judges without a prior interview.
- Immigration lawyer Ezequiel Hernรกndez advises those with pending cases to prepare and seek legal counsel, as cases will now be handled in deportation proceedings.
- Another lawyer, Haim Vรกzquez, warns that direct referral to immigration court increases the likelihood of asylum denial.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced new rules allowing U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to refer certain affirmative asylum claims directly to immigration judges within the Department of Justice. This change bypasses the traditional pre-interview process, prompting immigration lawyer Ezequiel Hernรกndez to advise individuals with pending asylum cases on how to proceed.
Hernรกndez emphasized that those with ongoing cases must prepare themselves, gather information, and secure legal representation. He explained that under the new policy, cases will be transferred to deportation proceedings under a judge's jurisdiction, rather than being handled by an asylum officer. "Now you will have a judge and not an officer to interview you," Hernรกndez stated. "This change speeds up processes and, of course, will facilitate deportations."
Despite the potential for faster deportations, Hernรกndez urged migrants with pending cases not to fear attending their court dates. He clarified that these are not the cases that will lead to immediate arrest upon arrival at court, encouraging them to present themselves. "The most important thing here is that people do not think they will be arrested in court as at the beginning of this administration," he said.
Now you will have a judge and not an officer to interview you. This change speeds up processes and, of course, will facilitate deportations.
However, immigration lawyer Haim Vรกzquez offers a more cautious outlook. He warned that asylum seekers referred directly to immigration court face a higher probability of their claims being denied. "Up to today, the affirmative asylum applicant has the possibility to go to an immigration judge and present their case. If it is denied, they can go to court and have a second chance," Vรกzquez explained. "Now, if it is referred directly, it is more likely that the benefit will be denied regardless of the argument presented."
The new regulation, titled "Affirmative Asylum Referrals Without Interview," applies to affirmative asylum claims lacking a clear legal basis for remaining in the country and presenting "clear impediments" to approval by USCIS. Criteria for direct referral include cases with specific deficiencies, though the article does not detail these further.
Up to today, the applicant of affirmative asylum has the possibility to go to an immigration judge and present their case. If it is denied, they can go to court and have a second chance. Now, if it is referred directly, it is more probable that the benefit will be denied without regard to the argument that is presented.
Originally published by La Naciรณn in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.