New York Times moves to quash Justice Department subpoenas targeting reporters
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The New York Times filed a motion to quash subpoenas served to its journalists.
- The subpoenas sought to identify sources for reports on security concerns regarding a Qatari-gifted Air Force One.
- The newspaper argues the subpoenas infringe on press freedom and journalists' constitutional rights.
The New York Times is fighting back against government subpoenas, filing a motion to quash demands served to its journalists. The subpoenas aimed to uncover the sources behind reports detailing security concerns surrounding the new Air Force One, a gift from Qatar.
This legal action sets the stage for a significant confrontation over press freedom. The newspaper contends that the Justice Department's subpoenas are a bad-faith attempt to punish The Times for its coverage. They argue these demands violate the constitutional rights of both the newspaper and its reporters.
David McCraw, the newspaper's senior vice-president and deputy general counsel, stated, "As we set out in our motion, these subpoenas are brought in bad faith to punish The Times for its coverage. They violate the constitutional rights of The Times and its journalists. We are going to court to defend our journalistsโ rights to report freely on the administration and to provide the public with stories that matter."
As we set out in our motion, these subpoenas are brought in bad faith to punish The Times for its coverage. They violate the constitutional rights of The Times and its journalists. We are going to court to defend our journalistsโ rights to report freely on the administration and to provide the public with stories that matter.
Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.