Nigeria's APC criticized for including state institution heads in campaign council

Nigeria's ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is facing scrutiny over the composition of its 2027 campaign council, with particular concern raised about the inclusion of heads of critical state institutions. While political parties typically assemble influential members for campaign efforts, the APC's choices have drawn criticism for potentially breaching public decency and propriety, even if not explicitly violating constitutional law.

The inclusion of technocrats and heads of agencies, who are often appointed based on expertise and are expected to serve the state impartially, is seen as problematic. Institutions responsible for vital functions such as tax collection (National Revenue Service) and citizen identification (National Identity Management Commission) are considered crucial and should ideally remain insulated from partisan political assignments. Similarly, officials overseeing national defense and security are expected to prioritize their state obligations above party loyalty.

While these officials may naturally sympathize with the government in power, their primary obligation is to the state as a non-partisan entity. The current political climate in Nigeria, often marked by unwholesome campaign practices, raises concerns that government financial or security managers involved in partisan roles might be tempted to compromise their official duties. Even in the absence of actual compromise, the potential for suspicion and the erosion of public trust is significant.

The article argues that this situation presents a moral dilemma, even if not strictly illegal. It highlights the importance of preserving the integrity of critical state institutions. While campaign councils may sometimes be symbolic, the act of enlisting key state officials for partisan activities can create a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to a fusion of the ruler, the party, and the state, thereby undermining the non-partisan common interest.