DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

North Korea's Constitution: Territorial Claims and Hostile Two-State Declaration

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Analysis Sources not specified New plan
  • North Korea amended its constitution in March, removing "socialist" from its name and eliminating principles of peaceful reunification.
  • A new territorial clause defines North Korea's domain as bordering China and Russia to the north and South Korea to the south, formalizing a "two separate states" system.
  • This constitutional change contrasts sharply with South Korea's definition of its territory and signals North Korea's intent to treat the South as a hostile foreign entity.

North Korea recently amended its constitution, a move that significantly alters its constitutional framework and signals a hardening stance towards South Korea. The revised constitution, announced in March, notably removes the term "socialist" from the country's official name and deletes previous references to achieving unification based on principles of self-reliance, peaceful reunification, and national unity.

The territory of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea includes the land bordering China and Russia to the north and South Korea to the south, along with its territorial waters and airspace.

โ€” North Korean Constitution (Article 2)The newly added territorial clause in North Korea's revised constitution.

The most striking change is the introduction of a territorial clause for the first time. Article 2 now states that the territory of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea includes the land bordering China and Russia to the north and South Korea to the south, along with its territorial waters and airspace. This constitutional provision explicitly defines South Korea as a "foreign" entity, thereby formalizing a system of "two separate states" based on permanent separation rather than a special relationship.

This constitutional declaration stands in stark contrast to South Korea's constitution, which defines the territory of the Republic of Korea as the Korean peninsula and its adjacent islands. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has criticized South Korea's constitutional claim, viewing it as an assertion that the South is territory and people to be "recaptured." He further stated that designating those who declare the South as the "main enemy" and collude with external forces for "regime collapse" and "absorption unification" as partners for reconciliation and unification would be an "unforgivable mistake."

South Korea's constitution clearly states that the territory of the Republic of Korea is the Korean peninsula and its adjacent islands.

โ€” Kim Jong UnKim Jong Un's criticism of South Korea's constitutional claim regarding territory.

The article also delves into the historical context of the North Korea-China border, referencing the 1712 Baekdusan Monument and the 1962 border treaty. It highlights how the treaty, while resolving border issues, led to North Korea gaining approximately 54% of the surface area of Lake Chonji (Heaven Lake) on Baekdusan (Mount Paektu). The author notes the secrecy surrounding these border agreements and the difficulty in accessing official documentation, underscoring the opaque nature of North Korea's foreign policy and constitutional changes.

Designating those who declare us the 'main enemy' and collude with external forces for 'regime collapse' and 'absorption unification' as partners for reconciliation and unification would be an unforgivable mistake.

โ€” Kim Jong UnKim Jong Un's statement on North Korea's view of South Korea as a hostile entity.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.