Nova Scotia whale sanctuary holds groundbreaking despite setbacks and local concerns

The Whale Sanctuary Project, a U.S.-based non-profit, marked the beginning of construction for a planned whale sanctuary in Wine Harbour, Nova Scotia, with a groundbreaking ceremony on Friday. The facility aims to provide a haven for whales retired from marine theme parks, a move supported by a growing international trend to ban cetacean captivity for entertainment.

“

I see a whale jumping, chasing a bird across the surface. Now is the time to do this for whales and dolphins, and we need proof of concept, which this will be, and more around the world to do the same.

Despite the ceremony, the project has encountered significant delays and setbacks. The initial plan to install nets by the end of summer has been pushed to next spring. Furthermore, the sanctuary has yet to rescue any whales, having its bids to take two orcas from France and 30 belugas and four dolphins from a shuttered Canadian facility rejected. These animals are instead being transferred to aquariums in the U.S. and Spain.

“

We’ve tried to meet every complaint that they have by being transparent.

Charles Vinick, CEO of the Whale Sanctuary Project, expressed optimism, envisioning a future where whales thrive in a naturalistic environment. The project involves a 40-hectare floating net enclosure, and Vinick emphasized the need for such sanctuaries as proof of concept for global conservation efforts. The Nova Scotia government approved a 20-year Crown lease for the project last October.

“

It does not seem realistic or sustainable and our concern is that it’s going to land on the taxpayers.

However, the sanctuary faces opposition from local residents and concerns from Marineland, a facility from which some whales were intended to be transferred. Marineland cited environmental concerns about contaminants at the Nova Scotia site from past gold mining activities. Vinick maintains that sanctuary studies deem the area safe. Local landowners, including Tracy Burns-Gagnon and Maureen Fraser, question the project's feasibility, transparency, and the chosen location, particularly since it is a U.S.-based organization. They also claim they were misled regarding the requirement for unanimous consent from adjacent landowners for cabinet approval.

“

Department of Natural Resources required unanimous consent from landowners. And we were approached to forfeit our ocean access for 20-plus years.