Pakistan's universities absent from global top 350, highlighting education funding gap
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Pakistani universities are not ranked among the world's top 350 in the QS World Universities Rankings 2027, with Quaid-i-Azam University at 381 being the highest entry.
- While some individual programs are ranked higher, the overall university positions reflect a lack of priority for education in Pakistan, evidenced by low budget allocations.
- The article contrasts Pakistan's situation with countries like Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Argentina, which have universities in the top 100 and higher per capita incomes and education spending.
The recent QS World Universities Rankings 2027 have highlighted a significant concern for Pakistan: no Pakistani university ranks within the world's top 350 institutions. Quaid-i-Azam University (QAU) is the highest-ranked Pakistani university at 381, though several individual programs at other universities like Nust, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute, Lums, IBA, and AKU are placed within the top 100-200 ranges for their specific disciplines.
This lack of top-tier overall university rankings is seen as a direct reflection of the low priority afforded to education in Pakistan. The article points to the nation's budget allocations for education, particularly higher education, as a key indicator. Spending less than one percent of GDP on education, including school levels, is presented as a likely reason for the absence of Pakistani universities in global top rankings.
The piece contrasts Pakistan's educational investment with that of other nations. It notes that among the top 100 universities globally, countries like Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Argentina, which have higher per capita incomes and significantly greater spending on education as a percentage of GDP, feature prominently. Similarly, countries with universities in the top 200, such as India, Qatar, Chile, Brazil, Mexico, the UAE, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Indonesia, and Malaysia, all demonstrate a stronger commitment to educational funding.
Financial resources are presented as crucial, with examples like MIT, Stanford, and Harvard universities boasting multi-billion dollar endowments and operational budgets. In contrast, Pakistani universities, both public and private, receive minimal government funding and lack substantial endowments. This disparity in financial backing is directly linked to their performance in international university rankings, suggesting that substantial investment is a prerequisite for achieving global academic standing.
Originally published by Dawn in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.