DistantNews
Support us

Parashat Matot-Masei: Don’t borrow identity

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

In-depth Sources not specified Context piece
  • Two tribes requested to settle east of the Jordan River, a request Moses initially feared due to past rebellions.
  • Moses agreed after recognizing their sincerity, establishing a contract for them to fight until the land was conquered.
  • The tribes fulfilled their promise, fighting for 14 years, demonstrating the importance of honor, honesty, and integrity in commitments.

As the Israelites stood on the threshold of Eretz Yisrael, ready to enter the promised land after defeating enemies and being counted, two tribes approached Moses with an unexpected request: to remain on the eastern bank of the Jordan River. This plea stirred painful memories for Moses, recalling the previous generation's rebellion and rejection of the opportunity to enter the land.

Rather than cross the Jordan, they asked to remain on the eastern bank.

— NarrativeDescribes the initial request of the two tribes.

However, Moses moved beyond these past traumas and recognized the sincerity of the request. He forged a meticulously crafted agreement, becoming a halachic model for contracts with stipulated conditions. The two tribes, later joined by half of a third, pledged to fight alongside the rest of the nation until the conquest was complete. This commitment was morally imperative; it would have been unacceptable for them to remain safe while their brethren risked their lives.

They fulfilled their promise in full. Not only did they fight throughout the seven years of conquest, but they remained for an additional seven years while the land was surveyed and divided among the tribes.

— NarrativeHighlights the tribes' dedication to their commitment.

They honored their word fully, participating in the seven years of conquest and an additional seven years for the land's survey and division. For 14 years, these two-and-a-half tribes lived apart from their families, demonstrating unwavering commitment and integrity. This story underscores the profound importance of standing by one's word, independent of any contractual obligation, as a mark of honor and honesty.

Standing by our word, independent of any contractual obligation, is the mark of honor, honesty, and integrity.

— Moshe TaraginReflects on the lesson learned from the tribes' actions.

Parashat Matot also addresses the laws governing oaths and verbal commitments, focusing on when a vow may be rescinded. The Torah allows for certain vows made by a young woman to be annulled by her father or husband, protecting her from impulsive declarations. This concept was expanded by the Sages to include annulment through hatarat nedarim before a panel of judges, a custom observed before Rosh Hashanah. This process provides a responsible way to repeal verbal commitments that can no longer be honored, acknowledging that life sometimes requires changing one's mind. Together, these narratives offer a balanced perspective on commitments: the importance of upholding them, as exemplified by the eastern tribes, and the provision for responsible annulment when necessary.

Sometimes life requires us to change our minds, and Halacha provides a responsible way to repeal verbal commitments that can no longer be honored.

— Moshe TaraginExplains the concept of annulling vows.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.