Parents association rejects Teachers' Union threat to limit inclusion of students with disabilities

The National Parents' Leadership Association has called on the Education Ministry to reject an ultimatum from the Teachers' Union that seeks to limit the integration of children with disabilities into classrooms. The parents' group described the union's demand as discriminatory and dangerous, arguing that it unfairly targets students rather than addressing the core issue of staffing shortages.

“

The Parents' Leadership Association views the Teachers' Union's letter with great concern. This is an improper, discriminatory, and dangerous demand that cannot be accepted in an education system committed to the values of equality, inclusion, and acceptance of others. Instead of fighting for additional staffing positions, the Teachers' Union has chosen to direct the spotlight at the children themselves.

In a statement, the Parents' Leadership Association expressed grave concern over the Teachers' Union's letter, labeling it "improper, discriminatory, and dangerous." The organization emphasized that such a demand is unacceptable in an education system committed to equality, inclusion, and acceptance. Instead of advocating for more staff positions, the association criticized the union for focusing its attention on the children themselves.

“

The state's role is to provide teachers with the tools needed for successful integration, not to remove children from the classroom. The education system cannot afford to send a message of exclusion.

Oren Ozen, chairman of the Parents' Leadership Association, stated that the government's role is to equip teachers with the necessary tools for successful integration, not to remove children from classrooms. His deputy, Tzofit Golan, called the Teachers' Union chairwoman Yaffa Ben-David's message "outrageous, dangerous, and unacceptable," urging that those lacking a budget should fight for resources, not for the exclusion of children.

“

outrageous, dangerous, and unacceptable. Anyone lacking a budget should fight for resources, not for the removal of children.

However, the Teachers' Union rejected the criticism. Anat Dadon, chairwoman of the union's Early Childhood Department, described the Inclusion Law in its current form as a "tragedy in the making." She explained that while the law's intent is commendable, its implementation is problematic. Dadon highlighted that classrooms often have five to seven students requiring individualized support packages, but lack sufficient assistance hours and professional staff, making the task impossible for educational teams. She urged parents to direct their anger at the government for failing to provide adequate staffing and resources, rather than at the teachers who are working under difficult conditions.

“

The intention behind the law is worthy, the problem lies in the way it is implemented. When a classroom includes five to seven students entitled to individualized support packages, without enough assistance hours and professional staff, educational teams find themselves facing an impossible task. The agreement was for up to two such students per class, but in practice there are two or three times that number.