DistantNews
Support us
Pension Fund for Well-being Was Not Halted, Says Sheinbaum After Court Ruling
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico /Economy & Trade

Pension Fund for Well-being Was Not Halted, Says Sheinbaum After Court Ruling

From El Universal · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Approved/passed
  • Mexico's Supreme Court has upheld the decree creating the "Fondo de Pensiones para el Bienestar" (Pension Fund for Well-being).
  • President Claudia Sheinbaum stated the fund is operational and not unconstitutional, assuring workers' savings are protected.
  • The fund aims to compensate for pensions for medium-wage earners by consolidating unused sub-accounts.

Mexico's Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) has given its approval to the decree establishing the "Fondo de Pensiones para el Bienestar" (Pension Fund for Well-being), a move President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo affirmed is proceeding as planned.

Addressing the matter during her press conference on Thursday, August 13, Sheinbaum stated that the fund "continues and was not stopped." She directed the Ministry of Finance to provide details on the fund's current resources. "That continues, that continues, that was not stopped. The Fund continues with its income to be able to have what would compensate for some of the pensions for the medium wage," she explained when asked about the transfer of funds from dormant sub-accounts.

That continues, that continues, that was not stopped. The Fund continues with its income to be able to have what would compensate for some of the pensions for the medium wage.

โ€” Claudia Sheinbaum PardoPresident Sheinbaum confirmed the ongoing operation of the Pension Fund for Well-being.

The President emphasized that the court's decision does not alter the fund's operations but rather validates its existing framework. "No, rather, what was already happening is approved, there is no longer, let's say, any unconstitutionality in this case," she responded when pressed on whether the ruling changed anything. The fund is intended to bolster pensions for individuals earning average wages by utilizing funds from sub-accounts that have remained inactive and are considered largely forgotten.

No, rather, what was already happening is approved, there is no longer, let's say, any unconstitutionality in this case.

โ€” Claudia Sheinbaum PardoPresident Sheinbaum clarified the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling on the fund.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by El Universal in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.