DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Elections & Politics

Pentagon removes classified operational files after generals voice opposition, Washington Post reports

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Newswire Unnamed sources Ongoing story
  • The Pentagon removed documents linked to the Secretary of Defense Orders Book from an internal portal on the classified SIPRNet system, according to The Washington Post.
  • The move followed reports that senior U.S. commanders had warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that a prolonged large-scale military campaign against Iran could not be sustained.
  • Officials said restricting access could slow urgent military planning, while the Pentagon declined to discuss its internal operational procedures.

The Pentagon removed decades of classified documents from an internal military network after reports that senior commanders had warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the risks of prolonging the war in Iran.

The Washington Post, citing three people familiar with the matter, reported that documents connected to the Secretary of Defense Orders Book had been taken down from an internal portal on SIPRNet, the classified computer system used by defense officials and the U.S. military. The people spoke anonymously because the system contains classified information.

It was not clear whether personnel could still access the documents through other channels, or how the change would affect military planning. SIPRNet stores information classified as secret, while top-secret material sits on a more restricted network.

As we have previously stated, the War Department will not publicly discuss internal operational deliberative processes, including the management, handling or access protocols for the Secretary of War Orders Book.

· Sean ParnellThe Pentagon spokesman responded to questions about the removal of the classified documents.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell declined to discuss the change but did not deny it. In a statement, he said, โ€œAs we have previously stated, the War Department will not publicly discuss internal operational deliberative processes, including the management, handling or access protocols for the Secretary of War Orders Book.โ€ The statement used the Trump administrationโ€™s preferred name for the Defense Department and Hegsethโ€™s position.

The orders book records the locations and availability of U.S. ships, military units, weapons systems and other resources. Senior commanders can mark themselves โ€œnon-concurringโ€ to register reservations about orders or warn that they could affect other military plans. The book is issued twice a month.

People familiar with the discussions said the commanders who recorded objections included Alexus Grynkewich, Francis Donovan, Samuel Paparo and Daryl Caudle. Kenneth S. Wilsbach and acting Army Chief of Staff Christopher LaNeve supported extending some deployments but warned of major risks. Officials have grown increasingly concerned about the warโ€™s length, the consumption of Patriot interceptors and Tomahawk missiles, and pressure on the Navy during the blockade of Iran. A former Defense Department official said moving the documents to a higher classification system could sharply reduce the number of people able to access them and complicate urgent decisions.

Military personnel success is Secretary Hegsethโ€™s top priority.

· Sean ParnellParnellโ€™s statement defended the use of secure channels for operational decisions.
About this summary

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.