Perkins Rocha: Rome Statute complaint won't stop ICC investigation

Perkins Rocha maintains that a complaint lodged under the Rome Statute will not impede the ongoing investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC). He contends that international human rights treaties, once ratified and incorporated into a country's legal framework, gain the status of domestic law. Consequently, these treaties possess characteristics of progressivity and inalienability, preventing authorities from withdrawing or ignoring their legal effect.

Rocha's argument underscores the supremacy of international human rights law once it is integrated into a nation's legal order. This integration means that national authorities are bound by the commitments made through these treaties. The concept of progressivity implies that human rights standards should continuously improve, while inalienability signifies that these rights cannot be taken away or renounced.

Therefore, any attempt to circumvent or halt an ICC investigation through domestic legal maneuvers or complaints related to the Rome Statute would be legally untenable if it contradicts the fundamental principles of ratified international human rights law. The legal standing of these treaties within a country's jurisdiction is paramount, ensuring that their protections remain effective and enforceable.