PM’s remarks on ‘mutual encroachment’ draw concern of border experts, government in ‘damage control’ mode

Prime Minister Balendra Shah is facing intense criticism after stating in Parliament that Nepal has also encroached upon Indian territory, a remark that caused an uproar among lawmakers. The statement came in response to questions about the disputed region of Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura, and Kalapani, which is claimed by both Nepal and India.

“

You might find it strange, but I also learned only recently, after becoming prime minister, that it’s not just India; Nepal too has encroached upon Indian territory in many places.

Opposition lawmakers demanded that the Prime Minister's remarks be expunged from parliamentary records. Meanwhile, diplomats and experts on border matters have expressed concern, asserting that Nepal has not encroached upon Indian territory in the manner suggested by Shah. The Prime Minister's office stated that Nepal has engaged in diplomatic discussions with both India and China regarding the disputed territories. Shah also expressed a desire for the United Kingdom to take an interest, given that the issue dates back to the period of British rule in India, advocating for resolution through dialogue and diplomatic negotiations.

“

We have spoken not only with India and China but also with the British government. Our view is that England [UK] should also take an interest, as the issue dates back to the period when the British ruled India.

An aide to the Prime Minister revealed that discussions were held with British Ambassador Rob Fenn regarding the historical Treaty of Sugauli (1816), suggesting the UK might hold crucial evidence and maps that could aid in resolving the boundary dispute. The aide emphasized that since the UK was a party to the treaty, it should support Nepal's efforts. However, the British envoy reportedly indicated that the issue is a bilateral matter between Nepal and India, and the UK would prefer not to interfere. Despite this, the aide insisted on the UK's potential role due to the historical legacy of the treaty.

“

Since the UK was a party to the Treaty of Sugauli, it may possess crucial evidence and maps that could help resolve the dispute with India and China. The discussion with the British envoy was an effort to permanently resolve the boundary dispute with India.