President Criticizes Judicial Branch's Absence from National Security Council

President Laura Fernández presided over the inaugural session of the National Security Council at the Presidential House, but the meeting was marked by the conspicuous absence of top officials from the Judicial Branch. This non-attendance drew sharp criticism from the president herself.

Fernández characterized the Judicial Branch's absence from the crucial security meeting as a "snub and tantrum." The president convened the council to foster transparency and prevent distortions in public debate, particularly concerning security matters. The Judicial Branch's refusal to participate raises questions about inter-branch cooperation and the commitment to a unified national security strategy.

The National Security Council is intended to be a forum for high-level coordination on matters critical to the nation's safety and stability. The absence of key judicial figures suggests a potential rift or disagreement between the executive and judicial branches of government, undermining the council's intended collaborative function.

While the article does not detail the specific reasons for the Judicial Branch's absence, Fernández's strong reaction indicates a significant political tension. The event occurred on July 20, 2026, and its implications for national security coordination and inter-branch relations remain a subject of discussion.

“

snub and tantrum