Presidential Office Slams Chief Justice's Unilateral Supreme Court Nomination
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Presidential Office criticized the Chief Justice's unilateral nomination of Supreme Court justice candidates as an unprecedented act.
- The office called the nomination process a "first in the history of the Korean constitution" and a "unilateral notification bypassing consultation."
- This situation is unusual as presidents have historically appointed nominated justices without rejection, following prior consultations.
The Presidential Office has officially stated its strong disapproval of the Chief Justice's nomination of Supreme Court justice candidates, calling it an unprecedented and unilateral action. The office described the process as a "first in the history of the Korean constitution" and a "unilateral notification bypassing consultation."
This move is particularly significant as it deviates from established norms. The office emphasized that such matters require thorough review of precedents and relevant laws. The situation has sparked speculation that the President might consider rejecting the nomination of Son Bong-ki, a judge at the Daegu District Court, who was proposed as a successor to former Supreme Court Justice Noh Tae-ak.
An unprecedented unilateral notification bypassing consultation.
Historically, the President has always appointed Supreme Court justices from the candidates nominated by the Chief Justice. This practice has typically involved prior consultations between the Chief Justice and the President before the formal nomination process. The absence of such consultation in this instance marks a significant departure from convention, raising questions about the judicial appointment process in South Korea.
A first in the history of the Korean constitution.
Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.