DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal /Crime & Justice

Prince Harry, Elton John ordered to pay millions in failed lawsuit

From Kathmandu Post · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Prince Harry, Elton John, and other claimants must pay millions in legal costs to the Daily Mail's publisher after a judge ruled their privacy lawsuits were conducted unreasonably.
  • Judge Matthew Nicklin ordered an interim payment of ยฃ9.54 million towards Associated Newspapers' legal costs, with a further damaging ruling that these costs should be paid on an โ€œindemnity basisโ€.
  • The ruling follows the dismissal of the claimants' case last month, which alleged unlawful activities by the Mail titles, including phone hacking.

Britainโ€™s Prince Harry and other prominent figures, including singer Elton John, face a substantial financial penalty after a judge found their failed privacy lawsuits against the Daily Mailโ€™s publisher were conducted unreasonably. Judge Matthew Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay an interim sum of ยฃ9.54 million towards Associated Newspapers' legal costs by August 28.

In my judgment, the cumulative effect โ€‹of these matters takes the case well outside the norm. The conduct was unreasonable to a high degree.

โ€” Judge Matthew NicklinExplaining the decision on costs and criticizing the claimants' case.

In a significant blow, Nicklin also ruled that the additional costs should be paid on an โ€œindemnity basis.โ€ This means the publisher does not need to prove the costs were reasonable and proportionate, potentially increasing the final bill for the claimants. This decision comes after the judge comprehensively rejected the case last month, dismissing allegations of widespread unlawful activities by the Mail titles, such as phone hacking.

another overwhelming โ€Œvictory for the Mail and its journalism

โ€” A spokesman for Associated NewspapersCommenting on the judge's ruling.

Nicklin was critical of how the claimants presented their case, noting that serious allegations were based on โ€œspeculative and inferentialโ€ foundations. He stated that the cumulative effect of these issues took the case โ€œwell outside the normโ€ and that the conduct was โ€œunreasonable to a high degree.โ€ A spokesperson for Associated Newspapers hailed the ruling as โ€œanother overwhelming victory for the Mail and its journalism.โ€

a complete and obvious whitewash

โ€” Prince HarryDescribing the dismissal of his lawsuit in July.

The judgment adds to Prince Harry's ongoing legal battles with the media. He previously won a case against the publisher of the Daily Mirror and settled a claim with Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper arm. The claimants' insurance policy covered ยฃ16 million of Associated's reported ยฃ34.5 million legal bill, indicating a significant shortfall.

the Daily Mail had made Meghanโ€™s life โ€œan absolute miseryโ€

โ€” Prince HarryRecounting the press's treatment of his wife.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Kathmandu Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.