'Putzer for Ritzer, Parsow for Parsons': What are the typos, errors that forced NTA to cancel 3 UGC-NET papers
Summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- India's National Testing Agency (NTA) will re-conduct three papers of the UGC-NET exam due to multiple errors.
- Errors included spelling mistakes, repeated questions, and identical option sequences in Sociology, English, and Commerce papers.
- This cancellation follows the earlier scrapping of the NEET-UG 2026 exam due to a paper leak.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) announced it will re-conduct three papers of the University Grants Commission National Eligibility Test (UGC-NET) examination following widespread errors. The exams for Sociology, English, and Commerce, held between June 22 and June 30, were found to contain multiple mistakes.
Candidates and educators reported significant issues, including spelling errors in scholarly names like "Ritzer" appearing as "Putzer" and "Parsons" as "Parsow." The English paper also featured questions repeated verbatim from previous UGC-NET cycles, with identical multiple-choice options. Similar repetitions of questions and numerical data were reported in the Commerce exam, affecting topics from corporate tax to accounting principles.
The NTA stated it formed a committee that identified "many factual, typographical, translation errors" in the affected papers. This decision marks the second major examination cancellation by the NTA this year, after the NEET-UG 2026 exam was scrapped due to a paper leak, which led to nationwide protests. The UGC-NET is crucial for determining eligibility for Assistant Professor positions and PhD admissions.
The Committee found that the three papers had many factual, typographical, translation errors, including misspelt names of prominent scholars, garbled book titles, errors in the stem wording of questions, grammatical errors, gender and number agreement errors, punctuation mistakes, and non-standard
Originally published by Hindustan Times. Summarized and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.