Referendum should have constitutional weight, but not every question deserves one

An opinion piece published in SME argues that while referendums should hold constitutional significance, not every question merits putting it to a public vote. The author posits that the inherent value of a referendum is its contribution to democracy, suggesting that this democratic investment requires careful consideration.

The piece implies that the power of a referendum as a tool for direct democracy is substantial. However, it raises a critical question about the appropriateness of using this tool for every conceivable issue. The underlying sentiment suggests a need for discernment in deciding which matters are significant enough to warrant the process of a referendum.

By stating that "the price of every referendum is actually an investment in democracy," the author emphasizes that such exercises are not to be undertaken lightly. This framing suggests that the democratic capital expended on a referendum should yield meaningful outcomes and address issues of genuine public importance. The implication is that frivolous or poorly framed referendums could dilute their impact and undermine their democratic weight.