Review: 'Gladiator II' cinematographer criticizes Ridley Scott's 'lazy' directing
Translated from Danish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Cinematographer John Mathieson criticized director Ridley Scott's work ethic on the film 'Gladiator II'.
- Mathieson described Scott as 'lazy,' stating he consistently used only two or three takes per scene.
- The cinematographer suggested Scott relied heavily on post-production to compensate for minimal shooting.
The making of "Gladiator II" has been overshadowed by behind-the-scenes criticism from its own cinematographer, John Mathieson. In a notable interview following the film's 2024 premiere, Mathieson openly described director Ridley Scott as "lazy."
Mathieson's critique focused on Scott's directing approach, alleging that the veteran filmmaker consistently settled for a minimal number of takes for each scene. According to the cinematographer, Scott would typically shoot only two or three takes before moving on, apparently relying on post-production to address any shortcomings.
lazy
This approach, Mathieson suggested, indicated a lack of effort on Scott's part during the actual filming process. The implication is that the visual quality and execution of the film may have been compromised by this method, with the burden of correction shifted to the post-production phase.
While Scott is a prolific and acclaimed director, this criticism from a key member of his crew offers a rare glimpse into potential challenges on set. The comments have brought Mathieson significant attention, albeit for reasons beyond his direct contributions to the film's cinematography.
Scott consistently settled for two or three takes of each scene and then relied on post-production to fix the rest.
Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.