RUBBER-STAMPED: Zero deviations — the record of Cape Town’s planning tribunal in 1,328 rulings
Summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Daily Maverick analyzed 1,328 cases heard by Cape Town’s Municipal Planning Tribunal between July 2025 and July 2026.
- The tribunal did not issue a ruling against a recommendation from the City’s planning department in any of the recorded cases.
- An objection to a proposed data centre raised concerns about pressure on electricity and water supplies in vulnerable, low-income communities.
Cape Town’s Municipal Planning Tribunal issued 1,328 rulings between 1 July 2025 and 31 July 2026, yet none went against the recommendations of the City’s planning department, according to Daily Maverick’s analysis.
One objection buried in the minutes of a northeastern panel meeting on 14 July 2026 focused on a proposed data centre near Cape Town International Airport. The objector said nearby communities in Barcelona and KTC in Gugulethu, along with St Joseph’s Children’s Hospital and other residential areas, could face pressure on electricity and water supplies.
The objection argued that the facility would draw much of its electricity from the neighboring Eskom substation in Philippi, potentially linking another community to the demand. It contrasted the data centre’s proposed substation and cooling technologies with the surrounding communities’ “free standing taps and pre-paid electrical boxes.”
It should not be lost on the Municipal Planning Tribunal that these are predominantly vulnerable and low-income communities who can barely afford to pay the municipal rates for electricity and water as it stands.
The objector warned that residents in predominantly vulnerable and low-income communities already struggle to pay municipal charges for electricity and water. “This additional stress on the grid will in no way shape or form benefit them in these circumstances,” the submission said.
It also raised concerns about cloud-computing security and the potential theft of personal data, arguing that the size of the proposed centre could make it vulnerable to security breaches. The submission said the applicant had characterized the project as a rezoning and amendment to a “basket of rights,” while failing to acknowledge consequences beyond the property itself. It concluded that the tribunal was not in a position to approve the application.
This additional stress on the grid will in no way shape or form benefit them in these circumstances.
Originally published by Daily Maverick. Summarized and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.