DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Culture & Society

Ruling Party Lawmakers Defend Starbucks Over 'Tank Day' Controversy

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Some lawmakers from the ruling People Power Party are defending Starbucks against criticism over its 'Tank Day' event, which is seen as mocking the May 18 Gwangju Democratization Movement.
  • One lawmaker argued that Starbucks will become a haven for conservatives and that the Minister of the Interior should be punished for interfering with corporate business.
  • Another lawmaker suggested 'tank' in the event's context referred to a liquid container, questioning the government's investigation into the matter.

A contentious debate has erupted in South Korea over Starbucks' 'Tank Day' event, with some ruling party lawmakers publicly defending the coffee giant against widespread criticism for allegedly mocking the May 18 Gwangju Democratization Movement.

From the President down to ministers and the Democratic Party, it's all about left-wing division. Starbucks will henceforth become a haven for conservatives and believers in market economy.

โ€” Han Ki-ho, People Power Party lawmakerDefending Starbucks and criticizing the government's response to the 'Tank Day' event.

This defense has ignited a firestorm, particularly from figures like Han Ki-ho, a four-term People Power Party lawmaker and former Army Lieutenant General. Han asserted on Facebook that Starbucks would henceforth become a 'haven for conservatives and believers in market economy' due to the government's perceived 'leftist' actions. He went further, calling for the Minister of the Interior to be punished for 'abuse of power' in allegedly interfering with the company's business operations. This stance positions the ruling party as a defender of corporate freedom against what they frame as politically motivated government overreach.

Adding to the controversy, Kim Min-jeon, another People Power Party lawmaker, questioned the government's response, suggesting that 'tank' in the context of a beverage company would naturally refer to a container. She sarcastically asked, 'What is this Ministry of the Interior's boycott movement?' and contrasted it with the perceived leniency towards content praising North Korea's Kim Il-sung. This rhetoric frames the government's actions as disproportionate and politically biased, aligning with a narrative that conservatives are being unfairly targeted.

In a business selling water, if they say 'tank,' it naturally means a container for liquids. What is this Ministry of the Interior's boycott movement?

โ€” Kim Min-jeon, People Power Party lawmakerQuestioning the government's investigation into Starbucks' 'Tank Day' event.

From our perspective, this incident highlights a deep political divide in how historical events and corporate actions are interpreted. While many South Koreans view the May 18 Gwangju Democratization Movement as a pivotal moment in our struggle for democracy, requiring solemn remembrance, these lawmakers are prioritizing a narrative of free speech and market principles, even at the risk of alienating a significant portion of the public. The framing of Starbucks as a 'conservative haven' and the accusations of government overreach reveal a broader political battleground where historical sensitivities are being weaponized for partisan gain. This is a uniquely Korean debate, reflecting our ongoing grappling with historical memory and political identity.

The Ministry of the Interior should be punished as an abuser of power for interfering with a company's business through state power.

โ€” Han Ki-ho, People Power Party lawmakerAccusing the Minister of the Interior of overreach in response to the Starbucks controversy.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.