Russia's War in Ukraine: Four Scenarios for Putin Amidst Escalation Fears

Russia's military is approaching a critical point in the Ukraine war, as a failure to make strategic decisions risks an unmanageable personnel crisis. Danish military analyst Anders Nielsen from the Royal Danish Defence College suggests Russia is losing more soldiers on the front than it can recruit through contracts.

Nielsen highlights that Ukrainian drone attacks on rear infrastructure exacerbate the situation, impacting the Russian army's logistics and operational capacity. He believes Vladimir Putin has only four main options for continuing the war, each fraught with serious risks for the Kremlin.

“

Russia is currently losing more soldiers on the front than it manages to recruit through contract.

The most likely scenario, favored by Russian generals, is a large-scale mobilization, potentially calling up 300,000 to 500,000 more men. However, Nielsen cautions that this would not solve the army's structural issues or guarantee victory, while imposing immense economic and social costs. He suggests this option would place the greatest pressure on Putin's regime.

“

The most likely scenario remains a large-scale mobilization in Russia.

Another option is to de facto freeze the front lines and limit attacks on energy infrastructure. Nielsen sees this as the most advantageous for the Kremlin's internal stability and most difficult for Ukraine. A prolonged conflict without decisive outcomes would continue to drain resources and harm both economies.

A third scenario involves a genuine armistice and abandoning initial objectives, potentially including the legal return of occupied regions to Ukrainian sovereignty. The analyst suggests this compromise could save the Russian economy and address growing public war fatigue.

“

This would be the most advantageous solution for the Kremlin's internal stability and, at the same time, one of the most difficult situations for Ukraine.

The most radical option is a direct military escalation against NATO, such as a limited incursion into the Baltic states. Nielsen posits this aims to intimidate Europe and force the West to reduce military support for Ukraine, but warns that a firm NATO response could lead to a rapid collapse.

“

The most radical scenario analyzed is a military escalation directly against NATO, through a limited incursion into the Baltic states.