DistantNews
Support us
Serbian court excludes secret surveillance evidence in student trial
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia /Crime & Justice

Serbian court excludes secret surveillance evidence in student trial

From N1 Serbia · () Serbian

Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified In the courts
  • A Serbian court postponed the trial of nine students accused of preparing acts against the constitutional order following a protest.
  • The court decided to exclude evidence obtained through secret surveillance as inadmissible.
  • Lawyers argue the students were "mobile listening devices" and that the excluded evidence was the prosecution's sole proof.

The trial of nine students, including first defendant Luka Stevanoviฤ‡, accused of preparing acts against Serbia's constitutional order after last year's Vidovdan protest, has been postponed. The delay came after the court decided to exclude evidence gathered through secret surveillance measures, deeming it inadmissible.

Stevanoviฤ‡ expressed relief following the postponement, stating, "I must honestly admit that a great weight has been lifted from my heart, not because any of us are guilty, none of us are guilty, but I consider this a great burden that we are all carrying." He anticipates that the prosecution will likely appeal the decision to exclude the evidence, but believes the Appellate Court will uphold the lower court's ruling.

Ljiljana Boroviฤ‡, a lawyer for one of the students, described the students as "mobile listening devices." She explained that orders for surveillance involved installing software on their mobile phones to conduct ambient listening, not just phone conversations. Boroviฤ‡ argued that this violated university autonomy, as every word spoken on campus was recorded since the secret surveillance began in January 2025. She maintained that even if this evidence were used, it would not prove the students committed the crimes they are accused of.

The second hearing was held at the Palace of Justice. The trial, which officially began on May 15, has been postponed multiple times. Boลกko ลฝuriฤ‡, another defense lawyer, called the court's decision to exclude the evidence "completely logical" and essentially a first-instance verdict. He believes that even if the proceedings were to continue, they should result in an acquittal, given that the excluded evidence was the primary, and perhaps only, proof the prosecution possessed.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.