DistantNews
Support us
Serbian Opposition Slams Anti-Corruption Agency as 'Tool of Authorities'
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia /Crime & Justice

Serbian Opposition Slams Anti-Corruption Agency as 'Tool of Authorities'

From N1 Serbia · () Serbian

Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Serbian opposition lawmakers criticized the Anti-Corruption Agency's performance, calling it a tool of the ruling party.
  • They highlighted a lack of results, including only one conviction in 2025 and Serbia's low ranking on Transparency International's corruption index.
  • Lawmakers questioned the agency's use of funds and its failure to investigate officials' assets, arguing corruption harms the state and its citizens.

Serbian opposition members on a parliamentary committee sharply criticized the Anti-Corruption Agency, labeling it a "cudgel in the hands of the authorities" that implements the ruling party's agenda. Miroslav Aleksiฤ‡, a lawmaker from the People's Movement of Serbia, argued that the agency has failed to combat corruption effectively. He pointed to a single conviction in 2025 and Serbia's slide to 116th place on Transparency International's corruption index, the lowest in the region.

The Anti-Corruption Agency is a cudgel in the hands of the authorities implementing their policy.

โ€” Miroslav Aleksiฤ‡Serbian opposition lawmaker criticizing the agency's performance.

Aleksiฤ‡ questioned the agency's expenditure of 422 million dinars from the 2025 budget, suggesting the funds were misused given the lack of tangible results. He specifically challenged the agency's director, Dejan Damjanoviฤ‡, about the failure to investigate the reported assets of officials, citing an example of a public functionary with a nearly half-million-euro apartment.

There are no results from the Agency, corruption today is killing the state of Serbia, the citizens of Serbia.

โ€” Miroslav Aleksiฤ‡Describing the impact of corruption on Serbia.

Duลกan Nikeziฤ‡ of the Party of Freedom and Justice echoed these criticisms, emphasizing the agency's limited role in verifying officials' wealth. He noted that the agency merely records and publishes declared assets rather than actively investigating discrepancies. Nikeziฤ‡ also accused the ruling Serbian Progressive Party of exploiting illegal humanitarian aid during election campaigns for 14 years without agency repercussions, and highlighted the engagement of 300 officials in campaign activities without accountability.

The Agency does not check assets and does not use its powers.

โ€” Duลกan Nikeziฤ‡Explaining the limitations of the Anti-Corruption Agency's verification process.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.